Cor Vasa 2026, 68(4):404-409 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2025.134

Endothelial Dysfunction in Non-Diabetic Patients and Coronary Calcification: A Different Pathway to Coronary Artery Disease?

Jan Pudila, Tasneem Faheemb, Štěpán Jeřábekc, David Zemáneka, Kristýna Bayerováa, Tomáš Kovárníka
a 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, the Czech Republic
b First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, the Czech Republic
c Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, the Czech Republic

Objective: To evaluate whether endothelial dysfunction (ED) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a lower prevalence of coronary macrocalcifications (CMC), a marker of more advanced and typically more stable plaque remodelling.

Methods: This secondary analysis included 77 consecutive patients enrolled in the FIGARO trial. Endothelial function was evaluated using the EndoPAT 2000 device, with ED defined as RHI < 1.67. Coronary angiograms were re-assessed by blinded reviewers for the presence of angiographically visible macrocalcification. Patients were categorised into three predefined groups: diabetics, non-diabetics with preserved endothelial function (RHI ≥ 1.67), and non-diabetics with ED. Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and angiographic findings
were compared across groups. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of CMC.

Results: ED was present in 21 patients (27.3%), and diabetes mellitus in 24 (31.2%). Overall, CMC was identified in 22.1% of the cohort. Among non-diabetic patients, the prevalence of CMC differed markedly across endothelial phenotypes: 31.6% in non-diabetics with preserved endothelial function versus only 8.8% in non-diabetics with ED (p = 0.04). Despite similar age and risk-factor burden, non-diabetic patients with ED had the lowest prevalence of CMC. In non-diabetics, preserved endothelial function independently predicted the presence of CMC (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.03–22.0; p = 0.045). This association remained significant in multivariable analysis adjusting for age, dyslipidaemia, arterial hypertension, CKD, and active smoking (OR 6.96, 95% CI 1.27–38.19; p = 0.026).

Conclusions: Among non-diabetic patients with CAD, endothelial dysfunction is associated with a markedly lower prevalence of coronary macrocalcification, indicating a non-calcified atherosclerotic phenotype. These findings support the concept of divergent atherosclerotic pathways, in which ED without metabolic abnormalities reflects earlier, inflammation-driven vascular pathology rather than calcific remodelling. Non-invasive endothelial function testing may help refine risk stratification by identifying patients more likely to harbour non-calcified and potentially vulnerable plaques, thereby providing complementary information beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease, Coronary calcification, Coronary pathophysiology, Endothelial dysfunction

Received: December 6, 2025; Revised: December 6, 2025; Accepted: December 14, 2025; Prepublished online: August 11, 2026; Published: August 31, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pudil J, Faheem T, Jeřábek Š, Zemánek D, Bayerová K, Kovárník T. Endothelial Dysfunction in Non-Diabetic Patients and Coronary Calcification: A Different Pathway to Coronary Artery Disease? Cor Vasa. 2026;68(4):404-409. doi: 10.33678/cor.2025.134.
Download citation

References

  1. Libby P, Bonow RO, Mann DL, et al. Atherosclerosis. In: Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2019:103-125.
  2. Dawson LP, Layland J. High-risk coronary plaque features: a narrative review. Cardiol Ther 2022;11:319-335. Go to original source...
  3. Florea A, Morgenroth A, Bucerius J, et al. Locking and loading the bullet against micro-calcification. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021;28:1370-1375. Go to original source...
  4. Shioi A, Ikari Y. Plaque calcification during atherosclerosis progression and regression. J Atheroscler Thromb 2018;25:294-303. Go to original source...
  5. Qin Z, Yu L, Zhang Y, et al. Coronary artery calcification and plaque stability: an optical coherence tomography study. Heliyon 2023;9:e23191. Go to original source...
  6. Al-Qaisi M, Kharbanda RK, Mittal TK, et al. Measurement of endothelial function and its clinical utility for cardiovascular risk. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008;4:647-652. Go to original source...
  7. Gumanova N, Gorshkov A, Klimushina M, et al. Associations of endothelial biomarkers, nitric oxide metabolites and endothelin with blood pressure and coronary lesions. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2020;41:20200024. Go to original source...
  8. Liu J, Pan S, Wang X, et al. Role of advanced glycation end products in diabetic vascular injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Eur J Med Res 2023;28:553. Go to original source...
  9. de la Cruz-Ares S, Cardelo MP, Gutiérrez-Mariscal FM, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and advanced glycation end products in newly diagnosed versus established diabetes. Nutrients 2020;12:238. Go to original source...
  10. Jiang H, Li L, Zhang L, et al. Role of endothelial cells in vascular calcification. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022;9:895005. Go to original source...
  11. Pan W, Jie W, Huang H. Vascular calcification: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. MedComm 2023;4:e200. Go to original source...
  12. Gimbrone MA Jr, García-Cardeña G. Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2016;118:620-636. Go to original source...
  13. Matsuzawa Y, Li J, Aoki T, et al. Predictive value of endothelial function by peripheral arterial tonometry for coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2015;26:231-238. Go to original source...
  14. Kovarnik T, Hitoshi M, Kral A, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus instantaneous wave-free ratio in assessment of lesion hemodynamic significance: the FiGARO study. J Am Heart Assoc 2022;11:e021490. Go to original source...
  15. Bonetti PO, Pumper GM, Higano ST, et al. Noninvasive identification of patients with early coronary atherosclerosis by digital reactive hyperemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2137-2141. Go to original source...
  16. Kuvin JT, Mammen A, Mooney P, et al. Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function in the ambulatory setting. Vasc Med 2007;12:13-16. J. Pudil et al.409 Go to original source...
  17. Hamburg NM, Palmisano JN, Larson MG et al. Assessment of endothelial function using digital pulse-amplitude tonometry. Am Heart J 2009;158:390-396. Go to original source...
  18. Riley RF, Patel MP, Abbott JD, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement on the management of calcified coronary lesions. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv 2024;3:101259. Go to original source...
  19. Li Q, Li P, Xu Z, et al. Association of diabetes with cardiovascular calcification and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2024;23:259. Go to original source...
  20. Mohan J, Shams P, Bhatti K, et al. Coronary artery calcification. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
  21. Takeda Y, Matoba K, Sekiguchi K et al. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes. Biomedicines 2020;8:182. Go to original source...
  22. McInerney A, Hynes SO, Gonzalo N. Calcified coronary artery disease: pathology, prevalence, predictors and outcomes. Interv Cardiol 2025;20:e02. Go to original source...
  23. Jin HY, Weir-McCall JR, Leipsic JA, et al. Relationship between coronary calcification and natural history of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14:233-242. Go to original source...
  24. Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA). Lancet 2018;391:31-40. Go to original source...
  25. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1395-1407. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.