Cor Vasa 2026, 68(4):404-409 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2025.134
Endothelial Dysfunction in Non-Diabetic Patients and Coronary Calcification: A Different Pathway to Coronary Artery Disease?
- a 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, the Czech Republic
- b First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, the Czech Republic
- c Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, the Czech Republic
Objective: To evaluate whether endothelial dysfunction (ED) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a lower prevalence of coronary macrocalcifications (CMC), a marker of more advanced and typically more stable plaque remodelling.
Methods: This secondary analysis included 77 consecutive patients enrolled in the FIGARO trial. Endothelial function was evaluated using the EndoPAT 2000 device, with ED defined as RHI < 1.67. Coronary angiograms were re-assessed by blinded reviewers for the presence of angiographically visible macrocalcification. Patients were categorised into three predefined groups: diabetics, non-diabetics with preserved endothelial function (RHI ≥ 1.67), and non-diabetics with ED. Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and angiographic findings
were compared across groups. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of CMC.
Results: ED was present in 21 patients (27.3%), and diabetes mellitus in 24 (31.2%). Overall, CMC was identified in 22.1% of the cohort. Among non-diabetic patients, the prevalence of CMC differed markedly across endothelial phenotypes: 31.6% in non-diabetics with preserved endothelial function versus only 8.8% in non-diabetics with ED (p = 0.04). Despite similar age and risk-factor burden, non-diabetic patients with ED had the lowest prevalence of CMC. In non-diabetics, preserved endothelial function independently predicted the presence of CMC (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.03–22.0; p = 0.045). This association remained significant in multivariable analysis adjusting for age, dyslipidaemia, arterial hypertension, CKD, and active smoking (OR 6.96, 95% CI 1.27–38.19; p = 0.026).
Conclusions: Among non-diabetic patients with CAD, endothelial dysfunction is associated with a markedly lower prevalence of coronary macrocalcification, indicating a non-calcified atherosclerotic phenotype. These findings support the concept of divergent atherosclerotic pathways, in which ED without metabolic abnormalities reflects earlier, inflammation-driven vascular pathology rather than calcific remodelling. Non-invasive endothelial function testing may help refine risk stratification by identifying patients more likely to harbour non-calcified and potentially vulnerable plaques, thereby providing complementary information beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease, Coronary calcification, Coronary pathophysiology, Endothelial dysfunction
Received: December 6, 2025; Revised: December 6, 2025; Accepted: December 14, 2025; Prepublished online: August 11, 2026; Published: August 31, 2026 Show citation
| ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Libby P, Bonow RO, Mann DL, et al. Atherosclerosis. In: Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2019:103-125.
- Dawson LP, Layland J. High-risk coronary plaque features: a narrative review. Cardiol Ther 2022;11:319-335.
Go to original source... - Florea A, Morgenroth A, Bucerius J, et al. Locking and loading the bullet against micro-calcification. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021;28:1370-1375.
Go to original source... - Shioi A, Ikari Y. Plaque calcification during atherosclerosis progression and regression. J Atheroscler Thromb 2018;25:294-303.
Go to original source... - Qin Z, Yu L, Zhang Y, et al. Coronary artery calcification and plaque stability: an optical coherence tomography study. Heliyon 2023;9:e23191.
Go to original source... - Al-Qaisi M, Kharbanda RK, Mittal TK, et al. Measurement of endothelial function and its clinical utility for cardiovascular risk. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008;4:647-652.
Go to original source... - Gumanova N, Gorshkov A, Klimushina M, et al. Associations of endothelial biomarkers, nitric oxide metabolites and endothelin with blood pressure and coronary lesions. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2020;41:20200024.
Go to original source... - Liu J, Pan S, Wang X, et al. Role of advanced glycation end products in diabetic vascular injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Eur J Med Res 2023;28:553.
Go to original source... - de la Cruz-Ares S, Cardelo MP, Gutiérrez-Mariscal FM, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and advanced glycation end products in newly diagnosed versus established diabetes. Nutrients 2020;12:238.
Go to original source... - Jiang H, Li L, Zhang L, et al. Role of endothelial cells in vascular calcification. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022;9:895005.
Go to original source... - Pan W, Jie W, Huang H. Vascular calcification: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. MedComm 2023;4:e200.
Go to original source... - Gimbrone MA Jr, García-Cardeña G. Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2016;118:620-636.
Go to original source... - Matsuzawa Y, Li J, Aoki T, et al. Predictive value of endothelial function by peripheral arterial tonometry for coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2015;26:231-238.
Go to original source... - Kovarnik T, Hitoshi M, Kral A, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus instantaneous wave-free ratio in assessment of lesion hemodynamic significance: the FiGARO study. J Am Heart Assoc 2022;11:e021490.
Go to original source... - Bonetti PO, Pumper GM, Higano ST, et al. Noninvasive identification of patients with early coronary atherosclerosis by digital reactive hyperemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2137-2141.
Go to original source... - Kuvin JT, Mammen A, Mooney P, et al. Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function in the ambulatory setting. Vasc Med 2007;12:13-16. J. Pudil et al.409
Go to original source... - Hamburg NM, Palmisano JN, Larson MG et al. Assessment of endothelial function using digital pulse-amplitude tonometry. Am Heart J 2009;158:390-396.
Go to original source... - Riley RF, Patel MP, Abbott JD, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement on the management of calcified coronary lesions. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv 2024;3:101259.
Go to original source... - Li Q, Li P, Xu Z, et al. Association of diabetes with cardiovascular calcification and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2024;23:259.
Go to original source... - Mohan J, Shams P, Bhatti K, et al. Coronary artery calcification. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
- Takeda Y, Matoba K, Sekiguchi K et al. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes. Biomedicines 2020;8:182.
Go to original source... - McInerney A, Hynes SO, Gonzalo N. Calcified coronary artery disease: pathology, prevalence, predictors and outcomes. Interv Cardiol 2025;20:e02.
Go to original source... - Jin HY, Weir-McCall JR, Leipsic JA, et al. Relationship between coronary calcification and natural history of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14:233-242.
Go to original source... - Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA). Lancet 2018;391:31-40.
Go to original source... - Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1395-1407.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.




