Cor Vasa 2026, 68(4):481-485 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2026.024

Sekundárna prevencia ischemickej cievnej mozgovej príhody pri foramen ovale patens.

Juraj Dúbrava
Oddelenie neinvazívnej kardiológie, Nemocnica sv. Cyrila a Metoda, Univerzitná nemocnica Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovensko

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is probably responsible for 5% of all ischemic strokes and 10% of strokes in young and middle-aged people aged 18-60 years. The assessment of the association between PFO and cryptogenic stroke is always only probabilistic. Currently, the best tool for assessing this probability is the PASCAL system (PFO-Associated Stroke Causal Likelihood). It is a simple and effective tool for selecting patients who have the highest benefit from transcatheter closure of PFO and the lowest risk of complications. The PASCAL classification is determined using the RoPE score (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) and echocardiographic risk characteristics of PFO - atrial septal aneurysm and right-left shunt intensity. It can be used to determine five levels of association between PFO and cryptogenic stroke: definite, highly probable, probable, possible, and unlikely association. In patients aged 18-60 years with a possible or probable association of PFO with cryptogenic stroke, transcatheter PFO closure and dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 to 6 months, followed by single antiplatelet therapy for 5 years, is recommended after exclusion of other causes of stroke. Patients with an atrial septal aneurysm and/or a large right-to-left shunt benefit most from PFO closure. © 2026, ČKS.

Keywords: Ischemic stroke, PASCAL classification system, Patent foramen ovale, Transcatheter closure

Received: February 16, 2026; Revised: February 16, 2026; Accepted: March 14, 2026; Prepublished online: August 3, 2026; Published: August 31, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dúbrava J. Sekundárna prevencia ischemickej cievnej mozgovej príhody pri foramen ovale patens. Cor Vasa. 2026;68(4):481-485. doi: 10.33678/cor.2026.024.
Download citation

References

  1. Elgendy AY, Saver JL, Amin Z, et al. Proposal for Updated Nomenclature and Classification of Potential Causative Mechanism in Patent Foramen Ovale-Associated Stroke. JAMA Neurol 2020;7:878-886. Go to original source...
  2. Caso V, Turc G, Abdul-Rahim AH, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after stroke. Eur Stroke J 2024;9:800-834. Go to original source...
  3. Kent DM, Ruthazer R, Weimar C, et al. An score to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology 2013;81:619-625. Go to original source...
  4. Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1011-1021. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Søndergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, et al. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1033-1042. Go to original source...
  6. Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1022-1032. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Kent DM, Saver JL, Kasner SE, et al. Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Stroke. JAMA 2021;326:2277-2286. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Messé SR, Gronseth GS, Kent DM, et al. Practice advisory update summary: Patent foramen ovale and secondary stroke prevention: Report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2020;94:876-885. Go to original source...
  9. Kavinsky CJ, Szerlip M, Goldsweig AM, et al. SCAI Guidelines for the Management of Patent Foramen Ovale. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv 2022;1:100039. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. Stroke. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2021;52:e364-e467. Go to original source...
  11. Lee PH, Song JK, Kim JS, et al. Cryptogenic Stroke and HighRisk Patent Foramen Ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:2335-2342. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kasner SE, Swaminathan B, Lavados P, et al.; NAVIGATE ESUS Investigators. Rivaroxaban or aspirin for patent foramen ovale and embolic stroke of undetermined source: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the NAVIGATE ESUS trial. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:1053-1060. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Diener HC, Sacco RL, Easton JD, et al; RE-SPECT ESUS Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1906-1917. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.